The Amazing Hubris of the Ruling Class Judiciary

6 08 2010

From Alpha and Omega Ministries:

The Amazing Hubris of the Ruling Class Judiciary

08/05/2010 – James White

If you expected full disclosure and fairness from any of the media relating to yesterday’s outrageous “let’s call this judicial, but it is anything but” torrent of revolutionary cultural drivel from US District Judge Vaughn R. Walker, you need to wake up. How many of the reports you saw, read, or heard, noted this one little fact:

The announcement did not mention DuMont’s sexual orientation, and the White House did not provide comment for this story. DuMont would only be the third known LGBT judge serving in the federal judiciary, which consists of more than 850 judgeships. The others are U.S. District Court Judge Deborah Batts, who was nominated for her judgeship in 1994 and sits in Manhattan, and U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker, who sits in San Francisco and was not publicly known to be gay when nominated in 1989. [source]

Yes, folks, this “legal” decision was rendered by none other than a homosexual. That will help explain the wild-eyed demagoguery that flowed from his pen, now enshrined in the law of the land. Check out some of these amazing statements:

“Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California constitution the notion that opposite-sex couples are superior to same-sex couples.”

Exactly! That’s because marriage has meaning, and what we are watching is the revolutionary re-definition of a term, an institution, and hence the culture that has always found its basis in that institution. Same-sex “couples” do not constitute a marriage anymore than one man and five women constitute a marriage or one woman and two dogs constitute a marriage. Marriage is one man, one woman, producing life and family. It’s just that simple, and every person reading this knows that to be true.

Religious beliefs that gay and lesbian relationships are sinful or inferior to heterosexual relationships harm gays and lesbians.

Remember, this is a homosexual making this “finding.” Of course, religious beliefs that relationships between 50 year old men and 8 year old boys are sinful “harm” those poor 50 year old pedophiles, too, so let’s be consistent, shall we? We expect this kind of rhetoric from practicing homosexuals, but to see it being said as if it has something to do with meaningful law only tells us have degraded the judiciary has become.

Children do not need to be raised by a male parent and a female parent to be well-adjusted, and having both a male and a female parent does not increase the likelihood that a child will be well-adjusted.

That’s why, of course, no one is really concerned about orphans or widows, right? Because, hey, your dad dies? No worries! Mom runs off? Won’t change a thing! This kind of demagoguery under the guise of legal opinion should be resulting in a massive chorus of condemnation, but is that what you are seeing in the media? No, you are seeing rejoicing, not condemnation. One wonders if the men of Sodom ever sunk to this level—but remember, even after God struck them with physical blindness, they continued to look for the door in the depth of their depravity. Blindness is no hindrance to the continued practice of perversion and depravity.

The gender of a child’s parent is not a factor in the child’s adjustment. The sexual orientation of an individual does not determine whether that individual can be a good parent.

Remember, this is being presented as legal reasoning, when in reality, it is nothing but pro-homosexual rhetoric being repeated by a practitioner of that lifestyle. But nothing Walker said can eclipse this absurd, revolutionary statement:

Gender no longer forms an essential part of marriage; marriage under law is a union of equals.

Can you believe you are reading these words, not merely as the private opinion of a moral reprobate, a cultural revolutionary, but as the conclusions of a “judge” in the United States of America? How can someone not blush with shame at the utterance of such absurdities? He cannot even say these words without exposing his own fraudulent reasoning: “no longer” shines a bright light upon the man’s revolutionary desire to fundamentally alter the culture of the United States. This kind of homosexual propaganda has no place in the legal system of a moral culture, but there it is.

Why do homosexuals feel the over-riding need to force the rest of us to accept their perversity as good and moral and acceptable? Why do they insist upon fundamentally altering the very structure of the family, abusing children by exposing them to such depravity and denying them proper parental role-models? The Scriptures tell us, plainly. Those who live in constant and willful rebellion against God are idolaters. They worship their own sin, and they want others to join them. But, they are made in the image of God, so they cannot avoid the constant effort it takes to suppress the knowledge of God, and silence the scream of conscience. This is why we see them standing on street corners displaying the most incredible levels of depravity all the while screaming at families, moms, dads, “normal” people, “Shame! Shame!” if they dare show disapproval toward their behavior. Just as their entire personhood has been twisted and turned from its created purpose, so their thinking, and behavior, is twisted and irrational.

If you were not praying that God would bring whole-hearted repentance (the only hope for a culture soaked in evil), you had better start now. Your kids, your grandkids, and every generation thereafter, will be facing the results of this kind of degradation of our nation. God bless America…with heart-felt, behavior changing, Spirit-borne repentance.





Bravo Miss USA Runner Up…Rasberries to what’s his name…

26 04 2009

Bravo to Miss USA runner up Carrie Prejean. She stood up for her belief that marriage is between a man and a woman…and she paid the price. Not only that, the questioner evidently went on a rampage and is disparaging her character for having 10 times more character than he ever will…

Now WHERE is all that tolerance I keep hearing about?





More On the Death of Free Speech (From Alpha and Omega Ministries)

24 04 2009

Once again….More On the Death of Free Speech (from Alpha and Omega Ministries)

04/22/2009 – James White

Last year I posted a blog article on the faux-marriage of Jennifer Kozumpli and Nicole Webber. These lesbians were pictured (one dressed as a man) holding an 18-month old girl, Sophie, which the caption identified as “their…daughter.” I commented on how abusive it is to subject a child to such conditions, and how this again shows us how far our culture has descended into utter reprobation in its views.

 

You may recall that a while later I received a note demanding we take down the picture. I blogged the following at that time, and I note that the links are still active and accurate:

 

Back on June 30th I posted a short note regarding the abuse inherent in depriving a little child of a father and a mother that comes from “same sex unions.” I made reference to a picture, posted on the Internet, in a major news source (MSNBC) as a glowing example of just how self-centered “same sex unions” have to be by nature. Here is the article I posted.

 

I was contacted by “jennifer kozumplik/nicole webber” (name provided on the contact page) and told to remove the image, found in the above linked article. I have done so pending my getting legal advice on the matter. You will find the image on the following websites, and something tells me “jennifer kozumplik/nicole webber” haven’t contacted USA Today, MSNBC, etc., demanding that the picture be removed. As I have said many times, and as more and more people are discovering, homosexuals do not ask for equal rights: they want super-rights, including the ability to shut down all expression of belief that reminds them of the moral evil by which they have chosen to identify themselves. This is a glaring example. Note the use of this picture by such national online sources as MSNBC and USA Today. Google will provide you with lots of examples, such as this one.

 

The two individuals have likewise posted similar pictures on Facebook; even those without a Facebook account (such as yours truly) can see them.

 

Even Flickr has them as well.

 

I wonder if they wrote to The Ledger as well? That one even provides the very same image they have demanded I remove in a zoomable form.

 

Clearly, these two individuals are not camera shy, and they surely did not grant “rights” to all of these sources to post their pictures. No, the reason for this is clear: homosexuals use the cover of “tolerance” as a demand for “silence” on the part of those of us who still identify moral evil as moral evil. These individuals are glorying in their rebellion against God’s moral law, and they are damaging not only themselves in their rebellion, but others too young to even understand what is being done to them. But they are intent upon making sure that no one reminds them of these facts that they know all too well.

 

I have been asking those “in the know,” and since the picture is an AP picture, all one needs is an account with AP to post it. These individuals do not have the right to selectively determine which sites post the pictures and which do not—they lost that right when they allowed the pictures to be taken in the first place. But their demands cannot change the reality of their actions, and the actions of all of those rushing off to California so that they can pretend that marriage is a term humans get to define (instead of an institution God Himself ordained) before common sense returns to that state (Lord willing) in November. My original post only used their picture as an illustration of a general moral evil that is being promoted in our day. They are not alone in putting their own sexual desires before the good even of themselves, let alone of a little child. It is the very essence of homosexuality, and the very essence of man-centered Western culture.

 

So today I was informed that a laywer from AP had sent us a cease and desist order. So I’ve once again removed the picture, though, you can see it, repeatedly, if you so desire, even with zoom capabilities, at all the links posted above. For, as we all know, the only reason the AP came after us is that a complaint was filed with them.

 

Compare this zealous activity with that of YouTube/Google. I noted last week that someone had posted a disgusting, vile, clearly illegal and slanderous video in which they used my own video, but cobbled together words and phrases from other videos, so as to accuse me of gross immorality. I informed YouTube/Google of the video. Last I checked, it is still posted. When I complained, I was told it wasn’t a copyright issue! So I asked to be directed toward the forms I needed to fill out on other grounds, and I did not even get a reply to the request.

 

Once again we see the elevation of a sexually-defined minority to the position of a protected group of elites based upon the society’s fear of “offense” of these elites, while, concurrently, there is an ever lessening concern for a much larger minority group’s rights, all due to the “political correctness” of the day. Somehow, long, long ago, these words were written:

 

“If the world hates you, know that it has hated me before it hated you…” (John 15:18)





Uh…Being Gay is NOT a gift; it’s a sin…period.

18 01 2009

Yes, you read that right. Being Gay Homosexual is an abomination…not a “Gift from God.”

I’m not sure which bible this “Pastor” is reading but he evidently doesn’t read very closely. How does one discount, or totally miss the following scriptures?

Leviticus 18:22 You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.

Leviticus 20:13 If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.

Romans 1:26 For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; 27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.

1 Corinthians 6:9 Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, 10 nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

1 Timothy 1:8 Now we know that the law is good, if one uses it lawfully, 9 understanding this, that the law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who strike their fathers and mothers, for murderers, 10 the sexually immoral, men who practice homosexuality, enslavers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine, 11 in accordance with the gospel of the glory of the blessed God with which I have been entrusted.

Now, lest you think that I’m picking unfairly on you…Mr. Homosexual, notice that others are condemned by God also; murderers, sexually immoral, liars, perjurers, etc.

None of these actions are acceptable to God.

So what to do?

Repent of your wicked ways.

Believe the Gospel you currently mock.

 

 

UPDATE: One commenter suggested that the “to lie with” is a mistranslation of the word shakar. He suggested that all that’s being spoken of here is either “to go to sleep” or “lay next to” or that only “forced rape” is meant by this word.

Well, Ian McKellan knows what it means.  Here are his words in response to the question on Leviticus 18:22:

Q to Ian McKellen:
I recently read in Citizen magazine (published by Focus on the Family) that you tear out pages of Bibles because of verses you find offensive to your homosexual lifestyle. . . . 

His Answer:
I’ll let slide the slur that my God-given sexuality is a mere lifestyle, and say yes, I do remove the page containing Leviticus 18:22 where it is asserted that “To lie with a man as with a woman is an abomination.” I know there is some confusion amongst you Christians as to what an abomination is, but it sounds abominable to me and I resent it. I don’t want those words near me at bedtime – they don’t relax me. It seems that Gideons provide their Bibles as a gift. Not looking them in the mouth, I always leave the rest of the Bible for the next occupant of the hotel room. Sometimes strongly-held beliefs disconnect. Much as I abhor censorship, the Leviticus verse on which you presumably base your own disaffection for people like me makes, you will appreciate, a poor bed-fellow in a lonely hotel room. . .





“Woe to you when all people speak well of you, …” (Uh….Ricky…that means you)

24 12 2008

Well,

This pathetic showing by America’s Pastor Rick Warren needs no commentary. After being photographed in a Gay Clothing Store (what was he doing there again?) He was contacted by Melissa Etheridge about his appearance at the Obama inauguration.

She was hesitant to have a Pastor on the same bill considering her stance on Homosexuality…she needn’t have worried. Ricky is about as far from a Pastor as you can get…as the bible defines it, that is.

Here is a short quote from the article:

I told my manager to reach out to Pastor Warren and say “In the spirit of unity I would like to talk to him.” They gave him my phone number. On the day of the conference I received a call from Pastor Rick, and before I could say anything, he told me what a fan he was. He had most of my albums from the very first one. What? This didn’t sound like a gay hater, much less a preacher. He explained in very thoughtful words that as a Christian he believed in equal rights for everyone. He believed every loving relationship should have equal protection. He struggled with proposition 8 because he didn’t want to see marriage redefined as anything other than between a man and a woman. He said he regretted his choice of words in his video message to his congregation about proposition 8 when he mentioned pedophiles and those who commit incest. He said that in no way, is that how he thought about gays.

At least Melissa called it just right…”He didn’t SOUND like a preacher.

No he doesn’t. A REAL PREACHER would have loved Melissa enough to risk her anger by lovingly telling her the truth.

Had he actually cared about Melissa’s eternal soul he might have gently told her about what the bible says about homosexuality. He might have lovingly mentioned what it says about what their destination is…how they are currently under the wrath of Almighty God…and then told her to repent, and believe the gospel.

But then again…that’s IF HE WAS A PREACHER.

As I said; this post needs no commentary except from our Lord Jesus himself:

Luke 6:26

“Woe to you when all people speak well of you, for their ancestors did the same things to the false prophets.

Here is the link to the complete article:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/melissa-etheridge/the-choice-is-ours-now_b_152947.html





Tolerance goes both ways…

13 11 2008

Well…a video is worth a thousand words…especially when a group of Homosexual supporters rip the cross out of an old lady’s hand, and stomp on it…

If this isn’t an illustration of the truth of the bible when it calls them God haters, I don’t know what is.